Political Correctness and PostmodernismDon ClossonIn recent years an orthodoxy of thought and words known as political correctness has established itself on college campuses throughout the land. Although many administrators and professors deny its existence, others see this orthodoxy strangling the marketplace of ideas that has made Western civilization's institutions of higher learning the envy of the world. For the Christian, this new orthodoxy creates a hostile environment for learning, due to its primary assumption that those societies most affected by Judeo-Christian thought are to blame for most of the world's problem.
At its core, political correctness is a rejection of Western civilization. It not only rejects the Judeo-Christian tradition and its notion of revealed truth, but it also rejects its trust in science as an objective, detached, truthfinding endeavor. During the decade of the '80s American higher education came under intense self-examination, withering internal and external criticism. In reality, this educational crisis has been the outward layer of a much deeper crisis--a general crisis in Western civilization.{1} What is being rejected is the hope that truth exists. Not just that we might have difficulty discerning truth, but that it is not there to be discerned. According to professor Barbara Herrnstein-Smith, former president of the Modern Language Association, "There is no knowledge, no standard, no choice that is objective."{2 } Modern scholars have decided that the written text has no meaning until the reader gives it meaning. Even more, the process by which the individual interprets, or gives meaning to, a text, is arbitrary. The original intent or meaning the author had when writing the material is inconsequential. There is one thing a professor can be absolutely certain of: almost every student entering the university believes, or says he believes, that truth is relative.{3} The implications go beyond the field of literature. It is truth itself which the au courant critics spurn, or more precisely, by reducing all truth to the level of opinion they spurn the legitimacy of any distinctions between truth and error. Yet what is the goal of liberal education if not the pursuit of truth?{4} The source of this pessimism is found in recent literary criticism. Terms describing this new trend in criticism are postmodern, deconstructionist, and the New Hermeneutic. Paul de Mann, Jacques Derrida, and Hans-Georg Gadamer are some of the key thinkers in this new tradition of interpretation. One result of this line of thinking is that higher education has shifted the spotlight from the original works of literature to the critic. In the words of Stanley Fish, professor at Duke University, No longer is the critic the humble servant of texts whose glories exist independently of anything he might do; it is what he does, within the constraints embedded in the literary institution, that brings texts into being and makes them available for analysis and appreciation.{5}
|